<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif">You are not wrong and it is on schedule of Swift 4.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif">Zhaoxin</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Georgios Moschovitis via swift-users <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:swift-users@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-users@swift.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
It would be great to be able to depend on 'binary' (i.e. precompiled) modules/packages using SPM. This would allow distribution of proprietary modules without the underlying source code, which is an important use-case.<br>
<br>
AFAIK, this is not possible at the moment, but I would love to be proven wrong.<br>
<br>
Any thoughts?<br>
<br>
-g.<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
swift-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:swift-users@swift.org">swift-users@swift.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.swift.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/swift-users</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>