<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class="">…oh, I just realized we’re on -users not -evolution here.</div></div></blockquote></div>:-) Core found an effective way to limit the distractions from evolution:<div class="">Over there, this would have been a proposal to remove enums [with associated objects] in favor of union types ;-)</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Tino</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Joking aside, imho it's a pity that all those fundamental discussions from the early times can't be published — I bet ideas like "everything is an expression" have been brought up, and the reason for their rejection could really help understanding the big picture of the language.</div></body></html>