[swift-users] Why is static a keyword?

[Adrian Zubarev]

Have you read closely the bug issue before posting your answer?



-- 
Adrian Zubarev
Sent with Airmail

Am 11. Mai 2017 um 19:05:13, Zhao Xin (owenzx at gmail.com) schrieb:

No. I think it is just a compromise.

Zhaoxin

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Adrian Zubarev <adrian.zubarev at devandartist.com> wrote:
I don’t think this is the answer that was asked for. I bet it’s more a technical question from the internal point of of view.



-- 
Adrian Zubarev
Sent with Airmail

Am 11. Mai 2017 um 18:59:58, Zhao Xin via swift-users (swift-users at swift.org) schrieb:

In Swift, you use `static in struct and enum` and `class in class`. For example,

struct Foo {
    static func bar() {
        
    }
}

class ClassFoo {
    class func bar() {
        
    }
}

Another the `class func bar()` can replace to `static` as well. Here the `static` and `class` are equal in functions of classes.

And `class` is a keyword.

class ClassFoo2 {
    static func bar() {
        
    }
}

Zhaoxin


On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Jose Cheyo Jimenez via swift-users <swift-users at swift.org> wrote:
I was expecting static to be a builtin. Does anybody know why it must be a keyword? 

Background. https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4834

_______________________________________________
swift-users mailing list
swift-users at swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users


_______________________________________________
swift-users mailing list
swift-users at swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-users/attachments/20170511/ec7de142/attachment.html>