<html><body><ul><ul><p><tt><font size="2">I agree that Service is not a particularly good name but that was the best I could think of. I liked Engine but (1) we are not implementing anything, just overlaying and (2) I didnt want any confusion with with the SSL Engine of OpenSSL.</font></tt><br><tt><font size="2"><br>So again, I would be interested in your recommendations!</font></tt></ul></ul>(1) `Service` has the same problem<br> if it’s just overlaying, maybe you should name it ‘TLSOverlay’, ‘TLSMiddleware’ or something.<br> I still think, `Engine` is a pretty good name though, but will keep thinking for better ones.<br><br><br>[g]<br>Great! I like Engine as well, save for those points above.<br>Fortunately we have plenty of time for naming :-)<br><br><BR>
</body></html>