[swift-server-dev] HTTP API Review
BAILEYC at uk.ibm.com
Tue Aug 22 06:05:56 CDT 2017
>> - (I haven’t tracked that particular decision) Why not calling the
That's the eventual goal, although at the moment there's only support for
the "server" APIs. I think as we get closer to a complete set of APIs
we'll definitely rename. We can also do that sooner if it make sense.
>> - Even it the module is currently called `SwiftServerHTTP`, isn’t the
HTTP type prefix redundant?
>> - If the Module was called `HTTP` then you could use `HTTP.Method`
if you wanted or simply omit the HTTP because it would be optional.
As Helge has said, we did have some previous discussion on this - the
quick summary is that retaining the HTTP prefix is beneficial for IDE
based code completion, so whilst its technically redundant it can actually
make it easier to program.
>> Various linking issues
These should just be fixed. If you'd like to raise PRs, those would be
gratefully received (although it might be work waiting until PR #26 is
From: Helge Heß via swift-server-dev <swift-server-dev at swift.org>
To: Helge Heß via swift-server-dev <swift-server-dev at swift.org>
Date: 22/08/2017 08:58
Subject: Re: [swift-server-dev] HTTP API Review
Sent by: swift-server-dev-bounces at swift.org
On 22. Aug 2017, at 09:53, Adrian Zubarev
<adrian.zubarev at devandartist.com> wrote:
> Well if it’s been settled in stone already, so be it. A short answer was
enough for me, thanks :)
I guess nothing is settled in _stone_ already, but I think it is good to
read up on the pros and cons people raised about features/decisions before
re-starting discussions from scratch :-)
swift-server-dev mailing list
swift-server-dev at swift.org
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-server-dev