[swift-server-dev] HTTP Parser
Chris Bailey
BAILEYC at uk.ibm.com
Tue Nov 15 08:32:45 CST 2016
Thanks for setting this up. I've filled out the Doodle Poll - do you
need/want me to set up a Webex once we've determined the day/time?
Chris
From: Logan Wright via swift-server-dev <swift-server-dev at swift.org>
To: Paulo Faria <paulo at zewo.io>
Cc: swift-server-dev at swift.org
Date: 11/11/2016 03:07
Subject: Re: [swift-server-dev] HTTP Parser
Sent by: swift-server-dev-bounces at swift.org
Good catch Paulo, fixed, make sure to double check your selections in case
it moved any of them on you.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:03 PM Paulo Faria <paulo at zewo.io> wrote:
I think on Tue 22 the first choice shouldn’t be there? For my timezone it
says 2AM and right next to it there’s a 2PM.
On Nov 11, 2016, at 12:57 AM, Logan Wright via swift-server-dev <
swift-server-dev at swift.org> wrote:
Hey everyone, I think it's about time we do some of the http sub-team
kickoff. We can discuss some of the topics in here and more generally
start breaking off.
Here's the doodle for interested. We're shooting for the week of the 21st.
We'll also collect minutes for those who can't make it.
http://doodle.com/poll/e2tffhkaergtd72p
- Logan
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:48 AM Tyler Cloutier via swift-server-dev <
swift-server-dev at swift.org> wrote:
Additionally, we are proposing using the Node.js, C language, HTTP parser
which has been tested in thousands upon thousands of currently deployed
applications so the likelihood of errors would be much lower than for a
home grown solution.
That being said I do appreciate the desire to be inclusive of developers
who might not be familiar with C. Not to mention the benefits of safety
provided by Swift. I just think in this case since the proposed parser is
so well tested and widely use, it would be the safer option to choose
that.
Tyler
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Jean-Daniel via swift-server-dev <
swift-server-dev at swift.org> wrote:
>
>
>> Le 7 nov. 2016 à 16:46, James Lei via swift-server-dev <
swift-server-dev at swift.org> a écrit :
>>
>> if HTTP Parser in C is use along with Swift, it may be difficult for
the Startups and Enterprise to adopt as an early adopters if something
will break, it would be difficult for the developers to debug if it's
cause by C or Swift.
>>
>> I favour writing in Swift from scratch to encourage software engineers
and the like to participate on the same languages from .Net, Java,
Node.js, Go, Rust community, etc
>>
>> Who will be our early adopters?
>
> If the primary users are the frameworks authors, I’m pretty sure the
final users won't care if the low level stuff are C wrappers or a pure
swift as long as it work out of the box and they can deploy and use the
framework easily.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-server-dev mailing list
> swift-server-dev at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev
_______________________________________________
swift-server-dev mailing list
swift-server-dev at swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev
_______________________________________________
swift-server-dev mailing list
swift-server-dev at swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev
_______________________________________________
swift-server-dev mailing list
swift-server-dev at swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-server-dev/attachments/20161115/d89b7371/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-server-dev
mailing list