[swift-lldb-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - LLDB Incremental - OS X (master) #268

[Lance Parker]

This one was fixed as part of Doug’s commit too

> On Oct 13, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Mishal Shah <mishal_shah at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> /Users/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-lldb-incremental-osx/swift/lib/Frontend/DiagnosticVerifier.cpp:66:11: error: enumeration value 'DK_Remark' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
>   switch (Kind) {
>           ^
> /Users/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-lldb-incremental-osx/swift/lib/Frontend/DiagnosticVerifier.cpp:66:11: note: add missing switch cases
>   switch (Kind) {
>           ^
> 1 error generated.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mishal Shah
> 
>> On Oct 13, 2017, at 11:29 AM, no-reply at swift.org <mailto:no-reply at swift.org> wrote:
>> 
>> New issue found!
>> 
>> [FAILURE] oss-lldb-incremental-osx [#268]
>> 
>> Build URL:	https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-lldb-incremental-osx/268/ <https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-lldb-incremental-osx/268/>
>> Project:	oss-lldb-incremental-osx
>> Date of build:	Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:40:12 -0500
>> Build duration:	50 min
>> Identified problems:
>> 
>> Compile Error: This build failed because of a compile error. Below is a list of all errors in the build log:
>> Indication 1 <https://ci.swift.org//job/oss-lldb-incremental-osx/268/consoleFull#-17106023043122a513-f36a-4c87-8ed7-cbc36a1ec144>
>> Changes
>> 
>> Commit 230fc70001ad732fdde4eca0fc2fb2f9d0965461 by anemet:
>> Handle/assert on DK_Remark
>> 
>> edit: lib/CodeGen/CodeGenAction.cpp
>> 
>> Commit 3e3c07968dd669600354971757c7c075bdef9e65 by anemet:
>> Handle/assert DK_Remark in SourceMgrAdapter
>> 
>> edit: lib/Basic/SourceMgrAdapter.cpp
>> 
>> Commit 351553e4f509adaa3dfe6af833cc4e33dfbe7512 by anemet:
>> Add DK_Remark to SMDiagnostic
>> 
>> edit: unittests/Support/SourceMgrTest.cpp
>> edit: lib/Support/SourceMgr.cpp
>> edit: lib/CodeGen/MIRParser/MIRParser.cpp
>> edit: include/llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h
>> 
>> Commit a921bfa044b15e017581d1d18441d804e3d6d381 by aschwaighofer:
>> Benchmark_RuntimeLeaksRunner: don't use non-existing --run-all flag
>> 
>> edit: benchmark/scripts/Benchmark_RuntimeLeaksRunner.in
>> 
>> Commit 8cd677eb1f368aeab6ba8f99e7da514873919194 by xi_ge:
>> [Refactoring] SR-6051 Expansion of `switch` statement missing cases
>> 
>> edit: lib/IDE/Refactoring.cpp
>> add: test/refactoring/ExpandSwitchCases/Outputs/with_default/L10.swift.expected
>> add: test/refactoring/ExpandSwitchCases/basic.swift
>> add: test/refactoring/ExpandSwitchCases/with_default.swift
>> add: test/refactoring/ExpandSwitchCases/partially_handled.swift
>> add: test/refactoring/ExpandSwitchCases/Outputs/basic/L10.swift.expected
>> add: test/refactoring/ExpandSwitchCases/Outputs/partially_handled/L11.swift.expected
>> add: test/refactoring/ExpandSwitchCases/Outputs/no_space_between_braces/L10.swift.expected
>> edit: test/refactoring/RefactoringKind/basic.swift
>> edit: include/swift/IDE/RefactoringKinds.def
>> edit: include/swift/IDE/Utils.h
>> add: test/refactoring/ExpandSwitchCases/no_space_between_braces.swift
>> edit: tools/swift-refactor/swift-refactor.cpp
>> edit: lib/IDE/SwiftSourceDocInfo.cpp
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-lldb-dev/attachments/20171013/0f2a0f14/attachment.html>