<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">During the discussion, people emphasized that dynamic features would be useful for more than Python interop, so if PyVal is the only way to get those benefits… I have no fear of JS-Bridges utilizing Python, or JSON-libraries build on top of PyVal — I just said that I don’t think it’s possible to prevent all abuses (adding restrictions might even cause abuse).</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div></blockquote><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=""><br class=""></div><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class="">So what if they do this highly theoretical thing? Is this going to be a superior way of programming? If yes, then let's all do it! If not, then a superior solution will eventually emerge. Are you afraid that the community will be "tainted" by bad code? That Foundation will be rewritten with PyVals? And then you will be forced to write in PyVals too? What's the issue here?</div></div></blockquote></div>What’s wrong with my formulation when I write „I have no fear“ so that there are questions if I’m afraid afterwards? ;-)<div class="">Once again: I just said that the proposed restriction won’t be able to prevent all abuse, which was claimed in an older post.</div><div class="">So I“m so un-afraid, I’d even prefer the more „dangerous“ (I don’t think so) variant without artificial restrictions.</div></body></html>