<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class="">It is easy to forsee the impact. Simply look to other language communities that have done similar things. C# added “dynamic” late in its evolution, which has even more power than what is being proposed here. What evidence of abuse have you seen?</div></div></blockquote></div>None, and I have little fear of abuse in general. But I don’t see any benefits either (in Swift).<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I also never feared abuse of currying, C-style for loops or post increment — yet people had strong motivations to remove those features.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Right now, some people say the proposed changes will be terrible, and others say they will be wonderful.</div><div class="">All what I’m saying is that real experience would be better than theories.</div></body></html>