<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Don’t forget that if you already know the type, you can leave out the type name, so for example, to supply a random bool a function, you could just use `.random()` instead of `Bool.random()`, which removes a lot of the extra redundant type names.<br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">2017/11/30 17:19、Dave DeLong <<a href="mailto:swift@davedelong.com" class="">swift@davedelong.com</a>>のメール:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Nov 30, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Jonathan Hull <<a href="mailto:jhull@gbis.com" class="">jhull@gbis.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8" class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Nov 30, 2017, at 1:58 PM, Dave DeLong <<a href="mailto:swift@davedelong.com" class="">swift@davedelong.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><br class="" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><blockquote type="cite" class="" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div class="">On Nov 30, 2017, at 2:48 PM, Jonathan Hull via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">I would personally go with:<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>Int.random //Returns a random Int</div></div></div></blockquote><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=""><br class=""></div><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class="">“Type.random” is so rarely used as to not be worth the addition, IMO. If you really need a random element from the *entire* domain, then I think you should have to manually create the ClosedRange<T> yourself.</div></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">What evidence do you have that this will not be used often? There are many types which aren’t comparable, and thus can’t have a ClosedRange. Bool, for example, would definitely require Bool.Random. I certainly use the full range of UInt and UInt8 on a regular basis (less so with Int).</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Bool doesn’t necessarily need “Bool.random”. You just just as easily do “[true, false].random()”</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">As for evidence… my own experience. Other than small-value types (like Bool), it is *exceptionally* rare to come across a situation where you need a random from the entire range. Random colors are interesting, but are rare because they can’t guarantee design aesthetic. Random Dates are nonsensical. Random Ints are maybe useful, but again, you almost always need a random Int from a range of possible values.</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I think it is important to have Type.random as the base because there are many types which would conform (not just Int & Double). For example, I might have an enum which returns a random case from MyEnum.random. How would you do that if random(in:) was the required base?</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I actually don’t think there should be a static “random()” method. I think it should be a member function, not a type function.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">As for picking a random enum, see the previous bit about picking a random bool. And that will get even easier once we get the patch where enums have a static value listing all their cases, such as “CardSuits.allValues.random()”.</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><br class="" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><blockquote type="cite" class="" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div class=""><div class="" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>Int.random(in: ClosedRange<Int>) //Works for Comparable types. Gives a result from the closed range. Closed Range is never empty.</div></div></div></blockquote><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=""><br class=""></div><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class="">This is redundant. In order to pick a random element, you’re saying I should have to do “Int.random(0 ..< 10)”? The redundancy here is that I have to specify Int twice: once for the “.random” call, and again for the type of the range. We can do better than that.</div></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">You didn’t have to specify it twice. You used integer literals for the range, which you could also do for Double or CGFloat. Also, I am proposing that we require a closed range, which would mean you would have to do Int.random(0…9). Otherwise we have to deal with ranges which are possibly empty.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">“0…9.random()” makes more sense to me than “Int.random(in: 0…9)". It makes it easier to change the type, and it doesn’t require me to know a priori the type of the range I’m dealing with.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Dave</div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>