<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Nov 8, 2017, at 4:30 AM, Wallacy via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class="">I do not agree with Ted that only a few projects should be ranked, everyone, as it is in npm should be available. Only be graded according to recommendations.<br class=""></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">I’m a bit confused. I’m not sure what comments of mine I’m referring to. The main thing I said is that I’d prefer the community grow libraries that are trialed and used first (and then possibly incorporated into “core Swift”) rather than focus on standardizing a set of new libraries for distribution with Swift from the onset.</div></body></html>