<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">In general, I agree with everything in the proposal.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I’d like to propose these alternative extensions for clients:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">1) As a client of an enum, I’d like to know in the future when a new value has been added to an enum, since I may have to do something about it. How about adding the “exhaustive” keyword to be used in the switch statement? Like</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">exhaustive switch excuse {<br class=""> case eatenByPet:</div><div class=""> // …</div><div class=""> case thoughtItWasDueNextWeek:<div class=""> // …</div><div class=""> default:</div><div class=""> // …</div>}</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">If exhaustive is used, there would be a warning if all cases aren’t covered *even though default exists*. This means that I as the client thought I had everything covered when I wrote this code.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">As already mentioned, this makes the default case un-testable, which brings me to</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">2) All non-exhaustive enums should have the pseudo value “default” that can be used just like a regular value. This would allow you to write code like:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">teacher.failedToHandInHomework(excuse: .default)</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">which would allow you to trip the default case in any code you may write.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">-Kenny</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Sep 13, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Jordan Rose via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8" class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">Proposal updated, same URL: <a href="https://github.com/jrose-apple/swift-evolution/blob/non-exhaustive-enums/proposals/nnnn-non-exhaustive-enums.md" class="">https://github.com/jrose-apple/swift-evolution/blob/non-exhaustive-enums/proposals/nnnn-non-exhaustive-enums.md</a>.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks again for all the feedback so far, everyone!</div><div class="">Jordan</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><br class=""><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Sep 12, 2017, at 17:55, Jordan Rose via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="">Sorry, I got distracted by other tasks! Both the discussion here and within Apple has moved towards making "non-exhaustive" the default, which, to be honest, I too think is the best design. I'll update the proposal today to reflect that, though I still want to keep both the "nonexhaustive" and "exhaustive" keywords for Swift 4 compatibility for now (or whatever we end up naming them). The compatibility design is a little less ambitious than Brent's; as currently proposed, Swift 4 mode continues to default to 'exhaustive' all the time, even in the actual Swift 5 release.<br class=""><br class="">I still want to respond to Brent's points directly, but I think you and Vladimir have done a good job discussing them already. I'll send out the updated proposal tomorrow, after I have a little more time to think about #invalid.<br class=""><br class="">Thanks for putting time into this!<br class="">Jordan<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On Sep 9, 2017, at 17:34, Rod Brown <<a href="mailto:rodney.brown6@icloud.com" class="">rodney.brown6@icloud.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class="">Jordan,<br class=""><br class="">Do you have any other thoughts about the ongoing discussion here, especially regarding Chris’ comments? As you’re the one pushing this forward, I’d really like to know what your thoughts are regarding this?<br class=""><br class="">- Rod<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">swift-evolution mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br class=""><a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution" class="">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution</a><br class=""></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div>_______________________________________________<br class="">swift-evolution mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br class="">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>