<div dir="ltr">On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hello Swift community,<br>
<br>
The review of SE-0185 - "Synthesizing Equatable and Hashable conformance" begins now and runs through August 15, 2017. The proposal is available here:<br>
<a href="https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0185-synthesize-equatable-hashable.md" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/apple/<wbr>swift-evolution/blob/master/<wbr>proposals/0185-synthesize-<wbr>equatable-hashable.md</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at:<br>
<a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.swift.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/swift-<wbr>evolution</a><br>
<br>
or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the review manager. When replying, please try to keep the proposal link at the top of the message:<br>
<br>
What goes into a review?<br>
<br>
The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:<br>
<br>
• What is your evaluation of the proposal?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Brilliant. However, I believe that this is a typo of some importance to clarify:</div><div><br></div><div>> The compiler synthesizes P's requirements for a struct with one or more stored properties if and only if all of the types of all of its stored properties conform to P.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I think the author means to write "...conform to {Equatable | Hashable}"; it is unclear what it means for a struct P to have stored properties that "conform to P" (which would be an odd restriction in any case). The same issue occurs in preceding bulleted list with respect to enums.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
• Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to Swift?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This is a wonderful addition.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
• Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, the author did an excellent job paralleling the existing rules for Codable synthesis; I agree fully with that approach as it makes this feature more easily learnable and predictable for all users.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
• If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I haven't in recent times, but I do know that other languages do this.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
• How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>A quick reading today; an in-depth study previously.</div><div><br></div></div></div></div>