<div dir="ltr">i reached out to the person running that repository a few months ago but they never responded.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Jacob Williams via swift-evolution <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">There’s also a PureSwift organization of GitHub that has several Swift PM packages built specifically with Linux support in mind<div><br></div><div><a href="https://github.com/PureSwift" target="_blank">https://github.com/PureSwift</a></div><div><br></div><div>It looks like it’s along the lines of SwiftBreezy, but it hasn’t died out…yet.</div><div><br></div><div>At the same time, this may just be another example of how without an Apple “backed”/supported repo, the community is very likely to become more and more fragmented as more and more people implement the same few frameworks with minor variations/improvements.<br><div><br><div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5"><div>On Aug 3, 2017, at 5:04 AM, Stephen Canon via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="m_7575688075012903285Apple-interchange-newline"></div></div><div><div><div class="h5"><div style="word-wrap:break-word;line-break:after-white-space"><blockquote type="cite">On Aug 2, 2017, at 7:03 PM, Karl Wagner via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:<br></blockquote><div><blockquote type="cite"><div><br class="m_7575688075012903285Apple-interchange-newline"><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;float:none;display:inline!important">It’s important to remember that computers are mathematical machines, and some functions which are implemented in hardware on essentially every platform (like sin/cos/etc) are definitely best implemented as compiler intrinsics.</span></div></blockquote><br></div><div>sin/cos/etc are implemented in software, not hardware. x86 does have the FSIN/FCOS instructions, but (almost) no one actually uses them to implement the sin( ) and cos( ) functions; they are a legacy curiosity, both too slow and too inaccurate for serious use today. There are no analogous instructions on ARM or PPC.</div><div><br></div><div>– Steve</div></div></div></div><span class="">______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>swift-evolution mailing list<br><a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br><a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution" target="_blank">https://lists.swift.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/swift-<wbr>evolution</a><br></span></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
swift-evolution mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.swift.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/swift-<wbr>evolution</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>