<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">There’s also a PureSwift organization of GitHub that has several Swift PM packages built specifically with Linux support in mind<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://github.com/PureSwift" class="">https://github.com/PureSwift</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">It looks like it’s along the lines of SwiftBreezy, but it hasn’t died out…yet.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">At the same time, this may just be another example of how without an Apple “backed”/supported repo, the community is very likely to become more and more fragmented as more and more people implement the same few frameworks with minor variations/improvements.<br class=""><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Aug 3, 2017, at 5:04 AM, Stephen Canon via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On Aug 2, 2017, at 7:03 PM, Karl Wagner via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:<br class=""></blockquote><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">It’s important to remember that computers are mathematical machines, and some functions which are implemented in hardware on essentially every platform (like sin/cos/etc) are definitely best implemented as compiler intrinsics.</span></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div class="">sin/cos/etc are implemented in software, not hardware. x86 does have the FSIN/FCOS instructions, but (almost) no one actually uses them to implement the sin( ) and cos( ) functions; they are a legacy curiosity, both too slow and too inaccurate for serious use today. There are no analogous instructions on ARM or PPC.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">– Steve</div></div>_______________________________________________<br class="">swift-evolution mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br class="">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div></body></html>