<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">I think it's some subtlety... I <i class="">might</i> vaguely remember someone saying something about it. Since a proposal didn't come of that, I'm assuming there was a technical issue or something. I could easily be wrong, though.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">- Dave Sweeris</div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jul 25, 2017, at 9:36 PM, Daryle Walker via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="">[Sorry if this's been discussed before.]<br class=""><br class="">As long as the superclass sub-object gets initialized, it shouldn't matter if the initializer was designated or convenience. Is there some subtle step on the two-phase initialization I'm missing? Or is this a point to extend in a future version of Swift?<br class=""><br class="">Sent from my iPhone<br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">swift-evolution mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br class="">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution<br class=""></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>