<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">+1 for the removal of ArithmeticOverflow alone.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Charles</div><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jul 20, 2017, at 5:31 PM, Ben Cohen via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi Swift community,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Following feedback during the 4.0 preview, a handful of minor amendments have been suggested to SE-104: Protocol-oriented integers that the core team feels are important to include into 4.0 as they have an impact on source stability.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">The review of this amendment begins now and runs through July 24th. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">The revised version of the proposal can be found here:</div><div class=""><a href="https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0104-improved-integers.md" class="">https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0104-improved-integers.md</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">A summary of the amendments to the proposal under review can be found here:</div><div class=""></div><div class=""><div class=""><a href="https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0104-improved-integers.md#whats-new-in-this-revision" class="">https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0104-improved-integers.md#whats-new-in-this-revision</a></div></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">This proposal does not reflect all of the feedback received on SE-104, but instead is a subset that are felt to be valuable _and_ easily achievable in 4.0 even at this fairly late stage of development. There are a few other items that the core team agree should be addressed, but will be deferred to a later version of Swift.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">In order to get as much feedback as possible in the remaining time left, we intend to merge these changes on GitHub during the review, and will then fix in-place following the review if any significant new ideas that impact the proposal come up.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at<br class=""><a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution" class="">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution</a><br class=""><br class="">or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the review manager. When replying, please try to keep the proposal link at the top of the message:<br class=""><br class="">What goes into a review?<br class=""><br class="">The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:<br class=""><br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>• What is your evaluation of the proposal?<br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>• Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to Swift?<br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>• Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?<br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>• If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?<br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>• How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?<br class=""><br class="">More information about the Swift evolution process is available at:<br class=""><a href="https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md" class="">https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md</a><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">Thanks,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Ben Cohen</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Review Manager</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div>_______________________________________________<br class="">swift-evolution mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br class="">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>