<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><span style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">The reason of this is that arguments were initially considered as tuple. If this is no more the case, then it’s no more a reason to keep Void as an empty tuple.</span></div></blockquote></div>Didn't have the time to look into the draft yet, but at first thought, your idea makes much sense to me — although my current standpoint is more moderate:<div class="">At least it's time to question Void as an empty tuple, and I appreciate discussions about cleaning up fundamentals of the language (hope that I can add something later this week).</div></body></html>