<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">Le 7 juin 2017 à 15:28, Xiaodi Wu <<a href="mailto:xiaodi.wu@gmail.com" class="">xiaodi.wu@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class="">These *are* changes related to SE-0110, and Chris and others have already proposed possibilities for sugar that could make this better. That’s exactly the discussion that was originally started, to be distinguished from the alternative in which you and others are proposing reversing 5 or 6 other proposals.</div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>That's wrong.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>"I and others" have always been after ergonomics regressions, not "reversing 5 or 6 other proposals" (how dare you???)</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Gw</div><div><br class=""></div></body></html>