<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On May 29, 2017, at 2:39 PM, Nicolas Fezans <<a href="mailto:nicolas.fezans@gmail.com" class="">nicolas.fezans@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class="">There are many aspects in the initial proposal that certainly need a more expert eye than mine. I have one question though. It seems to me that the constant expressions as known as constexpr in C++11 would be allowed as well. Is that right? If yes, are there any differences in the proposal to what is allowed in C++11? </div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>There’s enough interest in a “constexpr” feature that I suspect it (or something like it) will eventually get added, but as far as I know it’s not on any official todo list or roadmap or anything.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>- Dave Sweeris</div></body></html>