<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Mar 30, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Brent Royal-Gordon <<a href="mailto:brent@architechies.com" class="">brent@architechies.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">(That's why there's no adjective form of "string", which makes naming the protocol difficult.)</span></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">We-eelll, there is “Stringy”….</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">As tempting as it is to call the protocol this, it’s probably not a good idea.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">(then again, if we called it Text instead of String, we could then call the subsequence Subtext…)</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>