<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On Mar 23, 2017, at 2:45 PM, Matthew Johnson <<a href="mailto:matthew@anandabits.com" class="">matthew@anandabits.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""></blockquote><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">Sure, but this does effectively violate lexical scope boundaries as they exist in the original source.</span></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">If the yeas have it on SE-0159, and “private” is turned into “fileprivate”, the lexical scope boundaries of *everything* will be violated as they exist in the original source.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Charles</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>