<div dir="ltr">If that's the case, force unwrapping can be done with a different symbol. <div>Personally I like '!' for force unwrapping.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jose Cheyo Jimenez <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cheyo@masters3d.com" target="_blank">cheyo@masters3d.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div></div><div style="direction:inherit"><a href="https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/2015-December/000032.html" target="_blank">https://lists.swift.org/<wbr>pipermail/swift-evolution/<wbr>2015-December/000032.html</a></div><div style="direction:inherit"><br></div><div style="direction:inherit">Swift tries to be part of the C family of languages so keeping all the familiar symbols is on purpose. See the ?: operator. </div><div><div class="h5"><div style="direction:inherit"><br></div><div><div style="direction:inherit"><br></div>On Feb 15, 2017, at 10:01 AM, Sadiq <<a href="mailto:msadiqaadil@gmail.com" target="_blank">msadiqaadil@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr">I tried to find it there. I did not find it. You mean here<div><br><div><a href="https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/commonly_proposed.md" target="_blank">https://github.com/apple/<wbr>swift-evolution/blob/master/<wbr>commonly_proposed.md</a><br></div></div><div><br></div><div>right?</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Jose Cheyo Jimenez <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cheyo@masters3d.com" target="_blank">cheyo@masters3d.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div></div><div style="direction:inherit">Hi <span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)">Mohammad,</span></div><div style="direction:inherit"><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)"><br></span></div><div style="direction:inherit"><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)">This has been proposed before. Please see the commonly rejected section in the GitHub repo for Swift Evolution. </span></div><div style="direction:inherit"><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)"><br></span></div><div style="direction:inherit"><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)">Thanks!</span></div><div><div class="m_-7493058665802325829h5"><div style="direction:inherit"><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)"> </span></div><div><div style="direction:inherit"><br></div>On Feb 15, 2017, at 6:02 AM, Sadiq via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr">Hello,<div><br></div><div>I would like to suggest to change Logical NOT Operator from ! to something else. </div><div>It will increase the readability of the code and will avoid any confusion with the symbol used for force unwrapping of optional values. </div><div>It would be easier for new programmers to learn Swift as the first language. </div><div>I don't understand the rational behind using the same operator for two different purposes. </div><div><br></div><div>Thanks and Regards,</div><div>Mohammad Sadiq</div></div>
</div></blockquote></div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>______________________________<wbr>_________________</span><br><span>swift-evolution mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-evolution@swift.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution" target="_blank">https://lists.swift.org/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/swift-evolution</a></span><br></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>