<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><span></span></div><div><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div><span></span></div><div><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div>On Jan 20, 2017, at 00:09, David Sweeris via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:</div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><span></span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span>On Jan 19, 2017, at 23:26, Xiaodi Wu <<a href="mailto:xiaodi.wu@gmail.com">xiaodi.wu@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Hmm, I don't recall the earlier discussion,</span><br></blockquote><span>It was a *long* time ago. I'll see if I can find it. If I'm misremembering, then...</span><br><span></span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span>but IMO, Charlie's proposal is pretty sensible. Seems backwards to adding much broader things like default argument support for protocols motivated by a use case that should Just Work(TM).</span><br></blockquote><span>Agreed, if it can be made to work.</span><br></div></blockquote><br><div>Well I found the thread I was thinking of (<a href="https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20160111/006795.html">https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20160111/006795.html</a> and <a href="https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20160111/006798.html">https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20160111/006798.html</a>), and glancing over it, I was wrong. So... never mind about my reply to Charlie.</div></div><div><br></div><div>- Dave Sweeris </div></div></body></html>