<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">I wouldn’t keep it that narrow - monadic types like Optional also benefit from variance:<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><div style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Menlo; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><span style="font-variant-ligatures: no-common-ligatures;" class="">func p(_ data:Any?) {&nbsp;</span></div><div style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Menlo; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><span style="font-variant-ligatures: no-common-ligatures" class="">&nbsp;&nbsp;if data != nil {&nbsp;</span></div><div style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Menlo; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><span style="font-variant-ligatures: no-common-ligatures" class="">&nbsp; &nbsp; data.map { print($0) }</span></div><div style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Menlo; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><span style="font-variant-ligatures: no-common-ligatures" class="">&nbsp;&nbsp;}&nbsp;</span></div><div style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Menlo; color: rgb(169, 169, 169); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><span style="font-variant-ligatures: no-common-ligatures; color: #000000" class="">}&nbsp;</span></div><div style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Menlo; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><span style="font-variant-ligatures: no-common-ligatures;" class="">var a:String? = "foo"</span></div><div style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Menlo; color: rgb(51, 187, 200); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><span style="font-variant-ligatures: no-common-ligatures; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="">p(a)</span></div><div style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Menlo; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><span style="font-variant-ligatures: no-common-ligatures" class="">// -&gt; “foo"</span></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">-DW</div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Dec 9, 2016, at 12:24 PM, Hooman Mehr via swift-evolution &lt;<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8" class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div dir="auto" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div dir="auto" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">For the specific case of custom collections, I think it is worth providing a protocol as Doug noted before.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Quoting Doug Gregor (1/13/16, thread: "<font color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.85098)" face="Helvetica Neue" class="">Make generics covariant and add generics to protocols”)</font>:&nbsp;</div><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Swift’s value-semantic collections are covariant in their generic parameters, which we do through some fairly tight coupling between the compiler and standard library. From a theoretical standpoint, I’m very happy with the way value-semantic collections provide subtyping and mutation while maintaining soundness (== no runtime checks needed), and for me <b class=""><i class="">I would consider it “enough” if we were to formalize that compiler/collection type interaction with some kind of protocol so other collection types could opt in to subtyping</i></b>, because I don’t think variance—as a language feature—carries its weight outside of the fairly narrow collection-subtyping cases.<br class=""></blockquote><div class="">(Emphasis mine)&nbsp;</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I also agree with Doug and you that&nbsp;variance does not carry its weight outside of collection-subtyping cases.</div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div><div class="">-DW</div></body></html>