<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Oct 20, 2016, at 9:29 AM, Jonathan S. Shapiro via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="gmail_extra">Quick poll as a sanity check on a possible alternative for operators:</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_extra">If we admitted [:Sm:] and [:So:] and the traditional ASCII operator characters, would that cover the things that people currently feel passionate about? That would almost certainly be compliant with UAX31 once it settles, and I <i class="">think</i> it covers all of the cases people have raised here.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_extra">Useful links if you want to check:</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_extra"><blockquote style="font-size:12.8px;margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px" class=""><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">[:Sm:] <a href="http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/category/Sm/list.htm" target="_blank" class="">Symbol, Math</a></div></div></blockquote><blockquote style="font-size:12.8px;margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px" class=""><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">[:So:] <a href="http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/category/So/list.htm" target="_blank" class="">Symbol, Other</a></div></div></blockquote><div class="gmail_extra" style="font-size:12.8px"><div class="gmail_quote"></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_extra">Having looked it over, I'm concerned about including [:Sk:] in UAX31 operators, and I'm probably going to recommend in the UAX31 discussion that we shouldn't do so.</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div><div>On a quick glance, I think this would be acceptable to me.</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_extra">Jonathan</div></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">swift-evolution mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br class="">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>