<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Oct 6, 2016, at 11:39 PM, David Hart via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8" class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hello community,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">From all the proposals which has gone into Swift 3, <b class="">[SE-0025] Scoped Access Level</b> is the only one I’m having second thoughts about. Before launching a discussion around it, I’m curious to know if it's worth discussing it or if the “ship has sailed”. As the plan is to allow future versions of Swift to break source-compatibility in certain rare scenarios, perhaps we have a chance to reconsider certain proposals?</div></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>We are always willing to consider new input, but any source breaking change has to provide overwhelming rationale for it being worth the cost to the community.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>-Chris</div><div><br class=""></div><br class=""></body></html>