<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Sep 28, 2016, at 3:15 PM, Joe Groff via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8" class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><p style="color: rgb(17, 17, 17); font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; word-wrap: break-word; margin: 1.3125em 0px; font-size: 1.1429em; line-height: 1.3125em;" class="">Hello Swift community,</p><p style="color: rgb(17, 17, 17); font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; word-wrap: break-word; margin: 1.3125em 0px; font-size: 1.1429em; line-height: 1.3125em;" class="">The review of “Conditional Conformances” begins now and runs through October 7. The proposal is available here:</p><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span><a href="https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0143-conditional-conformances.md" class="">https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0143-conditional-conformances.md</a></div><ul style="margin-top: 21px; margin-bottom: 21px; padding-left: 1.5em; color: rgb(17, 17, 17); font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 15px;" class=""><li style="font-size: 16.5px;" class="">What is your evaluation of the proposal?</li></ul></div></div></blockquote><div>+1. </div><div><br class=""></div><div>I still think there is some possibility of relaxing the overlapping constraint problem but I’d rather have this feature in Swift 4 since it’s such a big win. The rules can always be relaxed later if we come up with a workable model.</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><ul style="margin-top: 21px; margin-bottom: 21px; padding-left: 1.5em; color: rgb(17, 17, 17); font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 15px;" class=""><li style="font-size: 16.5px;" class="">Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to Swift?</li></ul></div></div></blockquote><div>Definitely</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><ul style="margin-top: 21px; margin-bottom: 21px; padding-left: 1.5em; color: rgb(17, 17, 17); font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 15px;" class=""><li style="font-size: 16.5px;" class="">How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?</li></ul></div></blockquote><div>I’ve been thinking about it for some time and regularly run into the problem it solves. Participated in the draft proposal thread as well.</div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><div>Russ</div><br class=""></body></html>