<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Thanks Doug. I missed the rename, as earlier points still referred to ErrorProtocol. In regards to the CloudKit errors, I appreciate the strongly typed CKError, but why not have the methods return that type directly? Every usage of these methods is going to require such a cast, so why require it in the first place? I don’t understand what advantage erasing the strongly type error that was just created has when the developer will just have to bring it right back. Or is this just a first implementation?<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Jon</div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Aug 2, 2016, at 4:20 PM, Douglas Gregor <<a href="mailto:dgregor@apple.com" class="">dgregor@apple.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">On Aug 2, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Jon Shier via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>I’m not sure where to put such feedback, but the ErrorProtocol to Error rename that accompanied the implementation of this proposal is very, very painful. It completely eliminates the very useful ability to embed an associated Error type inside other types, as those types now conflict with the protocol. Also, was this rename accompanied by an evolution proposal? It seems like the change was just made when this proposal was implemented.</div></div></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">The rename was part of the proposal, in bullet #5 of the proposed solution (which, amusing, pastes as bullet #1 below):</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><ol class="" style="box-sizing: border-box; padding-left: 2em; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 16px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, 'Apple Color Emoji', 'Segoe UI Emoji', 'Segoe UI Symbol'; font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><li class="" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0.25em;"><p class="" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 16px; margin-bottom: 16px;">Rename <code class="" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Consolas, 'Liberation Mono', Menlo, Courier, monospace; font-size: 14px; padding: 0.2em 0px; margin: 0px; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.0392157); border-top-left-radius: 3px; border-top-right-radius: 3px; border-bottom-right-radius: 3px; border-bottom-left-radius: 3px;">ErrorProtocol</code> to <code class="" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Consolas, 'Liberation Mono', Menlo, Courier, monospace; font-size: 14px; padding: 0.2em 0px; margin: 0px; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.0392157); border-top-left-radius: 3px; border-top-right-radius: 3px; border-bottom-right-radius: 3px; border-bottom-left-radius: 3px;">Error</code>: once we've completed the bridging story, <code class="" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Consolas, 'Liberation Mono', Menlo, Courier, monospace; font-size: 14px; padding: 0.2em 0px; margin: 0px; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.0392157); border-top-left-radius: 3px; border-top-right-radius: 3px; border-bottom-right-radius: 3px; border-bottom-left-radius: 3px;">Error</code> becomes the primary way to work with error types in Swift, and the value type to which <code class="" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Consolas, 'Liberation Mono', Menlo, Courier, monospace; font-size: 14px; padding: 0.2em 0px; margin: 0px; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.0392157); border-top-left-radius: 3px; border-top-right-radius: 3px; border-bottom-right-radius: 3px; border-bottom-left-radius: 3px;">NSError</code> is bridged:</p><div class="highlight highlight-source-swift" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 16px;"><pre class="" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Consolas, 'Liberation Mono', Menlo, Courier, monospace; font-size: 14px; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; line-height: 1.45; word-wrap: normal; padding: 16px; overflow: auto; background-color: rgb(247, 247, 247); border-top-left-radius: 3px; border-top-right-radius: 3px; border-bottom-right-radius: 3px; border-bottom-left-radius: 3px; word-break: normal;"><span class="pl-k" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(167, 29, 93);">func</span> <span class="pl-en" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(121, 93, 163);">handleError</span>(<span class="pl-en" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(121, 93, 163);">_</span> <span class="pl-smi" style="box-sizing: border-box;">error</span>: Error, userInteractionPermitted: <span class="pl-c1" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(0, 134, 179);">Bool</span>)</pre></div></li></ol><div class=""><br class=""></div></div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class="" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>Also, the adoption of this proposal by the Cocoa(Touch) frameworks as seen in Xcode 8 beta 4 has made asynchronous error handling quite a bit more arduous. For example, the CKDatabase method fetch(withRecordID recordID: CKRecordID, completionHandler: (CKRecord?, Error?) -> Void) returns an `Error` now, meaning I have to cast to the specific `CKError` type to get useful information out of it. Is this just an unfortunate first effort that will be fixed, or is this the expected form of these sorts of APIs after this proposal?</div></div></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Prior to this proposal, you would have had to check the domain against CKErrorDomain anyway to determine whether you’re looking at a CloudKit error (vs. some other error that is passing through CloudKit), so error bridging shouldn’t actually be adding any work here—although it might be making explicit work that was already done or should have been done. Once you have casted to CKError, you now have typed accessors for information in the error:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><div class="">extension CKError {</div><div class=""> /// Retrieve partial error results associated by item ID.</div><div class=""> public var partialErrorsByItemID: [NSObject : Error]? {</div><div class=""> return userInfo[CKPartialErrorsByItemIDKey] as? [NSObject : Error]</div><div class=""> }</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""> /// The original CKRecord object that you used as the basis for</div><div class=""> /// making your changes.</div><div class=""> public var ancestorRecord: CKRecord? {</div><div class=""> return userInfo[CKRecordChangedErrorAncestorRecordKey] as? CKRecord</div><div class=""> }</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""> /// The CKRecord object that was found on the server. Use this</div><div class=""> /// record as the basis for merging your changes.</div><div class=""> public var serverRecord: CKRecord? {</div><div class=""> return userInfo[CKRecordChangedErrorServerRecordKey] as? CKRecord</div><div class=""> }</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""> /// The CKRecord object that you tried to save. This record is based</div><div class=""> /// on the record in the CKRecordChangedErrorAncestorRecordKey key</div><div class=""> /// but contains the additional changes you made.</div><div class=""> public var clientRecord: CKRecord? {</div><div class=""> return userInfo[CKRecordChangedErrorClientRecordKey] as? CKRecord</div><div class=""> }</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""> /// The number of seconds after which you may retry a request. This</div><div class=""> /// key may be included in an error of type</div><div class=""> /// `CKErrorServiceUnavailable` or `CKErrorRequestRateLimited`.</div><div class=""> public var retryAfterSeconds: Double? {</div><div class=""> return userInfo[CKErrorRetryAfterKey] as? Double</div><div class=""> }</div><div class="">}</div></div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- Doug</div><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class="" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Jon Shier</div><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span></div><br class=""><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jul 12, 2016, at 8:44 AM, Shawn Erickson via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">Thanks for the effort on the proposal and discussion and thanks to those working in the implementation.<br class=""><br class="">-Shawn<br class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="">On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:25 AM Charles Srstka via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex;">Wow, thanks! I’m delighted that Apple found this improvement to be worth inclusion in Swift 3. This will truly make the language much nicer to use with the Cocoa frameworks.<br class=""><br class="">Thanks!<br class=""><br class="">Charles<br class=""><br class="">> On Jul 11, 2016, at 11:19 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:<br class="">><br class="">> Proposal Link:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0112-nserror-bridging.md" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0112-nserror-bridging.md</a><br class="">><br class="">> The review of "SE-0112: Improved NSError Bridging" ran from June 30 ... July 4, 2016. The proposal has been *accepted*:<br class="">><br class="">> The community and core team agree that this proposal is a huge step forward that enriches the experience working with and extending the Cocoa NSError model in Swift. The core team requests one minor renaming of "attemptRecovery(optionIndex:andThen:)" to "attemptRecovery(optionIndex:resultHandler:)”. It also discussed renaming CustomNSError and RecoverableError, but decided to stay with those names.<br class="">><br class="">> Thank you to Doug Gregor and Charles Srstka for driving this discussion forward, and for Doug Gregor taking the charge on the implementation effort to make this happen for Swift 3!<br class="">><br class="">> -Chris Lattner<br class="">> Review Manager<br class="">><br class="">> _______________________________________________<br class="">> swift-evolution mailing list<br class="">><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br class="">><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution</a><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">swift-evolution mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br class=""><a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution</a><br class=""></blockquote></div>_______________________________________________<br class="">swift-evolution mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br class=""><a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution" class="">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution</a><br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div>_______________________________________________<br class="">swift-evolution mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br class=""><a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution" class="">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution</a></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>