<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Great proposal. I want to second that areSame may mislead user to think this is about identity.<br><br><div style="direction: inherit;">I like areEquivalent() but there may be better names.</div><div style="direction: inherit;"><br></div><div>Daniel Duan</div>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On Jul 21, 2016, at 6:32 PM, Robert Widmann via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jul 21, 2016, at 6:19 PM, Xiaodi Wu <<a href="mailto:xiaodi.wu@gmail.com" class="">xiaodi.wu@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">This is nice. Is `areSame()` being proposed because static `==` is the status quo and you're trying to make the point that `==` in the future need not guarantee the same semantics?</div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div><div>Yep! Equivalence and equality are strictly very different things.</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class=""><br class=""><div class="">Nit: I think the more common term in stdlib would be `areEquivalent()`. Do you think `same` in that context (independent of the word "ordering") might erroneously suggest identity?</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div><div>There is room for improvement here. Keep ‘em coming.</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Robert Widmann via swift-evolution <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>></span> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word" class=""><div class="">Hello Swift Community,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Harlan Haskins, Jaden Geller, and I have been working on a proposal to clean up the semantics of ordering relations in the standard library. We have a draft that you can <a href="https://gist.github.com/CodaFi/f0347bd37f1c407bf7ea0c429ead380e" target="_blank" class="">get as a gist.</a> Any feedback you might have about this proposal helps - though please keeps your comments on Swift-Evolution and not on the gist.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Cheers,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">~Robert Widmann</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div>
<br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">
swift-evolution mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br class="">
<a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution</a><br class="">
<br class=""></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>swift-evolution mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org">swift-evolution@swift.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>