<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="">> Questions about that proposal are often risen on the list.<br>
> Some think that we will still be able to supply () argument<br>
> to () -> T functions.<br>
><br>
> To clear that up completely, I suggest adding this grammar change<br>
> to SE-0066 or one of the newer proposals. Key idea is that parentheses<br>
> are part of function type grammar and have nothing common with tuples<br>
> or unit type.<br>
<br>
</span>Sure, that makes sense to me. Please submit a PR that expands on SE-0066 when this settles, I don’t think we need another review cycle. Thank you!<br>
<span class=""><font color="#888888"><br>
-Chris<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">As SE-0110 is now accepted, you may want to take a look at the pull request: <a href="https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/pull/415">https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/pull/415</a></div></div>