<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jun 29, 2016, at 9:14, Austin Zheng via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">I just want a name that is:<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">- a single English language word</div><div class="">- whose common meaning has something to do with privacy, access, permissions, or a similar grouping concept that the other three keywords fits into </div><div class="">- and intuitively describes the intensity of the behavior relative to the other three keywords</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I'm not sure if this is something we want to reopen, though, or what the right process would be.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Austin</div></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>At this point I would suggest that a new proposal add a <i class="">synonym</i> for 'fileprivate' in release X, with a plan to deprecate (warn on) 'fileprivate' in release X+1. X should also be greater than 3 because we're honestly still burned from the last discussion and bikeshedding, and the name would have to be <i class="">significantly</i> better than "fileprivate" to even go up for review.</div><br class=""><div class="">We tried to come up with something good; this was the one the core team thought was the best choice. Sometimes that's how it goes (cf. "static"/"class", "associatedtype").</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Jordan</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>