I mean, we have `protocol IteratorProtocol`, so this is par for the course!<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 09:46 Anton Zhilin via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">From the rationale follows that by default, we get the following<br>
precedence group declarations:<br>
<br>
precedencegroup RangePrecedence { ... }<br>
<br>
Everyone agrees? Any ideas on how to reduce redundancy without adding name<br>
conflicts?<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
swift-evolution mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution</a><br>
</blockquote></div>