<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jun 22, 2016, at 10:05 AM, Nate Cook <<a href="mailto:natecook@gmail.com" class="">natecook@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><div class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><b class="">Pull Requests</b></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><i class="">Additive</i></div><div class="">#346 Introducing with to the Standard Library<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>Yeah, mea culpa -- but mea culpa with a reason. Method cascades are not going to be in 3. This is intentionally a stop-gap additive feature specifically for 3, since it's so widely used in the dev community for both Swift constructs and Cocoa(touch) initialization. It's super easy-to-implement/add. If considered, it makes a lot of sense in the 3 timeframe. It makes less sense (although it's still useful) after 3.</div><div><br class=""></div><div><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><i class="">Additive</i></div></div></div></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div class=""><div class=""><div class="">#369 Conditional Compilation Blocks proposal <span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div class=""><div class="" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Definitely additive but it's stuff again that's extremely practical and has a big demand, all the way back to the first moments of open source, and it's pretty much all implemented as private methods now. </div></div></div></div></div></div><div><br class=""></div><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><i class="">Other</i></div><div class="">#370 Renaming the OS X Platform Conditional Compilation Test: Doug Gregor suggested this could just be implemented as a bug fix</div></div></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>I've put in the bug report. I tried implementing it myself, but apparently my compiler fu is not as strong as I hoped (although the errors in my patch seem to come from code I have absolutely nothing to do with -- I was thinking of throwing myself on Dmitri's mercy for that).</div><div><br class=""></div><div>-- E</div></body></html>