<div dir="ltr">I believe it was things like "+" and "-" for set union and subtraction, etc.<div><br></div><div>-Shawn</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:16 PM Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
Sent from my iPad<br>
<br>
On May 24, 2016, at 6:09 PM, Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
>> If we're going to repaint this bikeshed, I think we should also consider as an alternative some form of infix syntax for composing constraints. Rust uses `P1 + P2`, and various C++ proposals have suggested `P1 && P2`.<br>
><br>
> Given our reluctance to even overload operators for use with Set, I'd personally find this a bit incongruous.<br>
<br>
I don't recall a proposal around operators for Set. What did people want to use? The obvious candidates are way too hard to type on the keyboards we have today.<br>
<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Brent Royal-Gordon<br>
> Architechies<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> swift-evolution mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
swift-evolution mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution</a><br>
</blockquote></div>