<div dir="ltr">Hi Brent,<div><br></div><div>thanks, I should have caught that, unfortunately I don't know of a nice way to search the mailing list, other than searching your own inbox, which doesn't include messages from the time you weren't subscribed - how do you do it?</div><div><br></div><div>You're right, I found the previous conversation from over a month ago, where almost everyone +1'd, but it hasn't moved anywhere since, as far as I know. Or is there a proposal already? (Nothing was linked from the thread).</div><div><br></div><div>So apologies for the duplication, but let's take this as a signal to revive that conversation, as I haven't found any responses which were negative, I mostly saw positive ones and ones that didn't feel strongly about it.</div><div><br></div><div>Honza</div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:58 PM Brent Royal-Gordon <<a href="mailto:brent@architechies.com">brent@architechies.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">> What do you think? I welcome all feedback, I'd like to see if people would support it before I write a proper proposal.<br>
<br>
This has come up a couple of times, I believe most recently in the April 12 thread "[Proposal] mapValues". It always gets substantial, but not universal, support.<br>
<br>
If I were you, I would search the list archives for previous threads about mapping dictionaries and see which arguments have come up before. If they change your mind, great. If they don't, they'll make up your proposal's "Alternatives Considered" section.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Brent Royal-Gordon<br>
Architechies<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>