<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On May 17, 2016, at 10:40 AM, Adrian Zubarev <<a href="mailto:adrian.zubarev@devandartist.com" class="">adrian.zubarev@devandartist.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div id="bloop_customfont" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; margin: 0px;" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="clean_bq"><div class="" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div class="">You don’t seem to be tackling the case of “A Collection whose Element type is String”. If we’re generalizing the current “protocol<>” notion, why not make it as powerful as a generic signature, with the ability to specify same-type constraints and conformances on associated types?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div>- Doug</div></blockquote><div class=""><div class="" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br class=""></div></div><div class="" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">Which part of the manifesto did I left out? ^^ Could you provide a quick pseudo code example?</div><div class="" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br class=""></div><div class="" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">Do you mean something like `Any<Collection where Element == String>`? I’m not sure where I should consider such a scenario, maybe at future directions?</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div><div>That’s the part I’m referring to, yes. I just realized that your proposal isn’t lifting the restrictions on protocols with Self types or associated types, so my suggestion doesn’t make sense for your proposal without a significant increase in scope.</div><div><br class=""></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>- Doug</div><div><br class=""></div></div></body></html>