<div style="white-space:pre-wrap">Got it. In that case, count me in as +1 for most of the proposal but -1 on AttributedString and its ilk. I agree with you and others that types which are slated to receive the URL/NSURL treatment shouldn't go through an interim renaming dance.<br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 20:53 Brent Royal-Gordon <<a href="mailto:brent@architechies.com">brent@architechies.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">> Unless I'm mistaken, NSURL is not among the types being renamed in this proposal?<br>
<br>
It is not, because it's already receiving a value-type equivalent. But types like `NSAttributedString`, which the Foundation team eventually intends to provide value-type equivalents for, *are* in the proposal. I'm merely illustrating the problem by using a type which we've already decided will get a value-type equivalent.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Brent Royal-Gordon<br>
Architechies<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>