<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On May 6, 2016, at 8:54 AM, David Hart <<a href="mailto:david@hartbit.com" class="">david@hartbit.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">Chris, as many people seem to be currently in favour of renaming reduce to fold to support unfold, should be write a proposal, or can the modification be accepted with less formality?</span></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div><div>We would *definitely* have to have a full review period to rename “reduce”. We specifically considered whether to go with “reduce” or “fold”, and chose reduce. </div><div><br class=""></div><div>-Chris</div></div></body></html>