<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
        * What is your evaluation of the proposal?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>+1. I believe &quot;pass-through&quot; functions such as autoreleasepool, withExtendedLifetime/withUnsafePointer, dispatch_sync, etc. should all have a generic-result/rethrowing signature.</div><div>   </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">        * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a<br>
          change to Swift?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Workarounds were doable, but clunky.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
        * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of<br>
          Swift?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Seems so.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
        * If you have you used other languages or libraries with a<br>
          similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares<br>
          to those?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>N/A</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
        * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a<br>
          quick reading, or an in-depth study?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Quick reading of the proposal, because the implementation is very simple, and I&#39;ve implemented similar utility functions before.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jacob</div></div></div></div>