<font size=2 face="sans-serif">Fair enough. Thank you, sorry for being
late with my comment, great proposal, no other remarks.</font><br><br><br><br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Max Howell <max.howell@apple.com></font><br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Vadim Eisenberg/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL</font><br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Cc:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">swift-evolution@swift.org</font><br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">04/15/2016 01:04 AM</font><br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: [swift-evolution]
SE-0063: SwiftPM System Module Search Paths - JSON output of install dependencies
of a package</font><br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Sent by:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">max.howell@apple.com</font><br><hr noshade><br><br><br><font size=4 color=#2f2f2f face="HelveticaNeue">According to the proposal:<br>> We do not wish to provide a flag to automatically install dependencies
via the system packager. ... Instead we can provide JSON output that can
be parsed and executed by some other tooling developed outside of Apple.</font><font size=3><br></font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>This feature could be crucial for tools for automatic deployment of swift
applications, e.g. for cloud deployment tools. It is not clear if this
feature is part of future work or an optional extension to the proposal.
Could this feature have its own subsection in the proposal? Can the proposal
hint in some way that this feature is a "first-class citizen"
part of the proposal and has to be implemented?</font><br><br><font size=3>Let’s just say I’ll build it as part of the initial
work.</font><br><br><font size=3>It would be a pity to delay the proposal by another week
to clarify this section.</font><br><br><BR>