<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div dir="auto" class="">First of all, +1 on the idea.<br class=""><font color="#00afcd" class=""><br class=""></font>But second a question: in the Package.swift file providers section, what would need to be done in for example the "apt" case it a package has a different name on Debian and Ubuntu?<br class="">This is something that happens occasionally, so we should at least be able to support this.<br class=""><font color="#00afcd" class=""><br class=""></font>Is this something that can be tackled by using (optional) extra parameters on the enum values?<br class=""></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div><div class="">Good point, this is lacking from the proposal and should be addressed.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">An immediate suggestion is (like you say):</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""> <font face="Courier New" class="">.Apt(.Ubuntu(version: “15.10”, installName: “"), .Debian(“bar”))</font></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Though I think this is getting confusing, so this is not a concrete proposal.</div></div><br class=""></body></html>