Indeed! For me, the reverted syntax makes sufficient sense.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:58 AM Brent Royal-Gordon <<a href="mailto:brent@architechies.com">brent@architechies.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">>> So in other other words, the change from `stride(from: 1, to: 2, by: 0.1)` to `1.stride(to: 2, by: 0.1)` is the source of the problem and should be reversed.<br>
><br>
> It is reversed in SE-0006.<br>
<br>
Wow, as of seven days ago. That's a very pleasant surprise (and one that's probably relevant to this thread).<br>
<br>
--<br>
Brent Royal-Gordon<br>
Architechies<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>