<div style="white-space:pre-wrap">I feel a proposal coming on...</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:39 PM Chris Lattner via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
> On Feb 3, 2016, at 8:02 PM, David Waite <<a href="mailto:david@alkaline-solutions.com" target="_blank">david@alkaline-solutions.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> -1 , as it changes the meaning of ‘!’ from ‘fault program on error’ to mere flow control.<br>
><br>
> I’m surprised nobody has beat me to suggesting the interrobang, though.<br>
<br>
Random factoid, but we briefly discussed how logical it would be if the ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional sugar were T‽ instead of T!… :-)<br>
<br>
-Chris<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
swift-evolution mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution</a><br>
</blockquote></div>