<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Yeah, I'm not to bothered by this either way. Back to the discussion about closure syntax, maybe?<br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On 24 Dec 2015, at 14:05, Alan Skipp <<a href="mailto:al_skipp@icloud.com">al_skipp@icloud.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div></div><div>I'm completely against replacing '->' by ':' it would make unreadable the declaration of a function taking a closure as parameter, or returning one (among other things).</div><blockquote type="cite"><div class=""><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div class="">-- </div><div class=""><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">Pierre</div></div></div></blockquote><br><div>I agree with Pierre. Parameter names and functions as arguments or return values are easily distinguished currently. </div><div><br></div><div>Replacing -> with :, would severely impact readability. </div></div></blockquote></body></html>