<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">I'm completely against replacing '->' by ':' it would make unreadable the declaration of a function taking a closure as parameter, or returning one (among other things).</span><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px" class="">That's definitely right: Two different separators only shift the problem by one level, but hopefully it won't become common to deal with "functions having functions as parameters that have function parameters that… ;-)</p><div class="">Also there is the different meaning of ":" ("is a...") and "->" ("returns a…")</div></div></body></html>