<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">I'm completely against replacing '->' by ':' it would make unreadable the declaration of a function taking a closure as parameter, or returning one (among other things).<br class=""><div class=""><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div class="">-- </div><div class=""><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">Pierre</div></div>
</div>
<br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">Le 23 déc. 2015 à 18:07, Alexander Regueiro via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> a écrit :</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="">Virtually everyone agrees `=>` is a much clearer delimiter/separator. `in` is too textual and not easy enough to distinguish from following code.<br class=""><br class="">Also, other languages (e.g. C#) have no problem with the `=>` symbol, as anyone with even a little experience programming knows greater-than-or-equal to is `>=`.<br class=""><br class="">However, if we adopt the new function type specifier syntax (replacing `->` with `:` for the return type), then `->` could be used in place of the `in` keyword, to make you happier.<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On 23 Dec 2015, at 04:11, Ricardo Parada <<a href="mailto:rparada@mac.com" class="">rparada@mac.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">I think "in" is slightly easier to type in than "=>". <br class="">The => may be interpreted as equal or greater than.<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">On Dec 22, 2015, at 9:52 PM, Andrey Tarantsov via swift-evolution <<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">And yes, I certainly would prefer `=>` rather than `in`.<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">It seems like the community can actually agree on this.<br class=""><br class="">Does anyone know if it has any parsing problems / grammar implications right now? <br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">swift-evolution mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" class="">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br class="">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution<br class=""></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>