<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class="" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">Can you add to the proposal why a function cannot be added for tertiary expressions (under “Alternates Considered”):</div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div><div>That's one fresh idea, and I like it. I can't find anything wrong with it, except that fn doesn't need to be an @autoclosure, just a Bool.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>I believe the customary name for that function is iff.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>I always wrap ?: in parenthesis for readability anyway.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>A.</div><div><br class=""></div></div></body></html>