<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">Am 13.12.2015 um 15:26 schrieb Marc Knaup <<a href="mailto:marc@knaup.koeln" class="">marc@knaup.koeln</a>>:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class="">I agree though that "in" is confusing and I never understood what "in" means here.</div><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class="">Since "do" is no longer used for loops but code blocks it would make sense to replace "in" with "do“. </div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>Well, I read</div><div><br class=""></div><div>{ error <b class="">in</b> … }</div><div><br class=""></div><div>as meaning, „error“ is bound within („in“) the following statements. I’m fine with that.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>-Thorsten</div></body></html>