<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Fair enough point. But wouldn't we still want indentation erasure which would be counter-intuitive for what we expect from triple backticks? like... a block of json defined in the middle of a function, this having maybe two levels of indentation to be erased. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Drew Crawford <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:drew@sealedabstract.com" target="_blank">drew@sealedabstract.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">That's an interesting idea! What about """ for escaped strings and ``` for unescaped literal strings?<div><br></div><div>The latter is intuitive for me for preformatted text (with JSON et al are), and Swift in fact uses Markdown for doc comments, so we assume some familiarity from the developer.</div></div></blockquote><div> </div></div>
</div></div>